Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
An interesting point on prohibition Print E-mail
Written by Tom Bowman   
Monday, 03 November 2008

I received an interesting booklet in the post this week from the Transform Drug Policy Foundation, an outfit that presses for reform of drug law in the UK. I can't say I agree with them on every single point – their proposals could, arguably, leave the drug market over-regulated and thus fail to eradicate the deeply harmful illegal trade. But nonetheless, it's good to have someone campaigning for good sense on such an important issue.

The arguments against prohibition are well rehearsed, and will probably not be new to readers of this blog. To sum them up in a series of bullet points (more or less borrowed from the IEA's excellent Prohibitions):

  • Prohibition places markets in criminal hands
  • It increases the risk of already risky activities
  • It criminalizes people who would not otherwise be criminals
  • It divert police resources away from activities that actually harm third parties
  • It increases public ignorance
  • It doesn't actually work (i.e. if you can't keep drugs out of prisons, how can you keep them out of a free society)

Another interesting point against prohibition, which I had not previously thought about much, is mentioned in Transform's booklet:

[I]llegal markets under prohibition always tend to cause concentration of available drug preparations which are more profitable per unit weight. Just as under alcohol prohibition the trade in beer gave way to more concentrated, profitable and dangerous spirits, the same trend has been observed over the past centuries with opiates – from opium (smoked or in drinkable preparations) to injectable heroin, and more recently with the cannabis market being increasingly saturated with more potent varieties. With coca-based products the transformation has been dramatic... It was prohibition which first cocaine powder onto the streets in the first place, and finally produced high-risk smokable crack.

Wouldn't it be nice if politician's understood and appreciated the law of unintended consequences?

Comments (5)Add Comment
Friedman & Prohibitionism
written by Craig Pirrong A/K/A StreetwiseProfessor, November 03, 2008
Milton Friedman made this point donkey years ago. Can't recall exactly where in his writings--maybe Free to Choose.
...
written by Current, November 03, 2008
Richard Cowan and Mark Thornton have written about this extensively. They call this the "Iron law of Prohibition".

http://www.fee.org/publications/the-freeman/article.asp?aid=801
Another important bullet point
written by Mark Wadsworth, November 03, 2008
If we legalised it and taxed it the same as alcohol or tobacco, we could rake in several billion in additional taxes; that's in addition to the cost savings i.e. police can concentrate on other stuff, fewer drug offenders in prison etc etc.
...
written by cash back real estate, November 04, 2008

High income taxes encourages criminal and illegal drug activity because they easily evade and do not pay taxes; thus criminal activity becomes a more attractive avenue than lawful businesses.
The Iron Law of prohibition
written by Steve Rolles, November 04, 2008
HI - Im the author of the report. thanks for flagging it up (the pdf version is free to download BTW, and print copies are available on request). I hope people will find it a useful contribution to the ongoing debate and any feedback is very welcome (email: steve -at- tdpf.org.uk)

Regards the 'iron law of prohibition' - I perhaps should have referenced it, and it is not a point we can take credit for originating. On the subject of politicians and unintended consequences, It is interesting to note that The director of the UN's drug agency, the UNODC, recently published a paper in which he outlined three such unintended consequences including; the creation of a 'huge criminal black market'. More details here:

http://transform-drugs.blogspot.com/2008/03/unodc-director-declares-international.html


Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: