Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
Eroded liberties 8 Print E-mail
Written by Dr Madsen Pirie   
Thursday, 26 June 2008

It’s an important safeguard that proceedings should only be brought against acts which are illegal in the place they are committed.  A person should obey the law of the jurisdiction in which they find themselves.  They can do things quite legally in the Netherlands which might be illegal in Britain.  This principle is among those which have been eroded.  Aiming to act against paedophiles, UK law has been amended so that people can be prosecuted in British courts for actions committed overseas.  The belief was that overseas jurisdictions might be lax in their laws or enforcement on acts the British government is determined to prevent, even if committed abroad.

It establishes the undesirable principle that the British government can regulate the behaviour of its citizens wherever they happen to be.  The principle should instead be that it reserves the right to regulate the behaviour of those within its jurisdiction.

Comments (0)Add Comment

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: