




| I demand to have some booze |
|
|
| Written by Philip Salter | |
| Saturday, 01 November 2008 | |
|
Comments (2)
![]()
... written by Blog Administrator, November 02, 2008
Re: the comment above...
We're not suggesting that the taxpayers' money be used to prop up failing pubs! The point is simply that the government should stop taxing and regulating them out of existence. We're not seeing economic darwinism at work as pubs close, but rather the baleful influence of government interference. And as with most government interference, it's the small businesses which suffer most. Independent pubs go out of business, while the big chains (which can afford to pay for lawyers, accountants and 'compliance' experts) take over. Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.
|
Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here:
Let the paying customer decide which pubs survive - good economic Darwinism. Government should stop trying to be a modern day Canute - using taxpayer's money to subsidise failures.