Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
Shock smoking plans Print E-mail
Written by Helen Davidson   
Saturday, 20 September 2008

Pause in the street for a cigarette today and you could find yourself approached by one of a team of stop smoking officers employed to roam the capital. Under plans for a ‘hard hitting’ approach smokers will be approached at bus stops, betting shops and shopping centres and offered a carbon monoxide test to ‘shock’ them into signing up for a stopping smoking service. The plans come on the back of a similar scheme for fat-busting nurses to patrol the streets of Scotland armed with measuring tapes and equipment to test blood pressure.

We all know that smoking is a filthy, expensive and deadly habit - we are told as much by the health warnings emblazoned across our cigarette packets. And we are quite aware that eating fatty foods and drinking too much is not the best way to ensure that you are around to see your great grandchildren. Smoking, drinking and eating too much are choices – choices that we should be free to make.

The approach increasingly adopted by the state - harassing, shaming and persecuting those who do not conform to the puritanical lifestyle that they espouse is designed explicitly with stigmatisation in mind. Government sponsored campaigns increasingly portray smokers and drinkers as unattractive or morally corrupt. But, shaming us into believing that certain choices we make are dirty or abnormal is nothing less than state-sanctioned bullying. And there is nothing attractive or moral about bullies.

Comments (2)Add Comment
I'm Going To Spark Up Now
written by Dan, September 20, 2008
I quit smoking about 4 months ago for purely personal reasons. I've never been closer to sparking up again than after reading this.
And I'm paying for this!
written by MarkE, September 22, 2008
What I resent most is that I am paying for these sinecure holders through my taxes, yet I have never smoked, my BMI is near the middle of the "ideal" range, and I eat rather more than five portions of fruit & vegetables each day.

No doubt the sinecure holders would painstakingly explain that every death costs me, as a taxpayer, trillions of pounds, and they would be lieing! A death at 50 from lung cancer can cost no more than a death at 80 from prostate cancer, but the latter will also receive a pension for 15 years and may have required more care if also suffering from some form of dementia.

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: