Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
Be prepared Print E-mail
Written by Dr Eamonn Butler   
Tuesday, 19 August 2008

A few days ago on the Adam Smith blog, Callum Adams-Carr wrote that kids were perfectly responsible human beings. They were just never given the opportunity, in today's nannying state, to be responsible. Quite so. And there's more to it: they are never given the opportunity to learn to be responsible either.

We're so worried about the dangers of knife crime, for example, that we try to keep knives out of the hands of children. But that's the point: kids never learn, under the guidance of adults, how to use knives responsibly – and that knives are dangerous. Likewise with booze: health puritans find alcohol bad enough for adults, but to give it to children is positively shocking. Our repugnance of militarism leaves us with a deep suspicion of the boy scouts. The result? Kids form themselves into their own platoons of street gangs, drink specifically to get hammered, and start sticking blades into each other.

The French have it right, introducing kids to alcohol in the home, where adults can teach them its pleasures and its evils. We had it right when we sent kids to the boy scouts and gave them penknives for Christmas. Under adult supervision they learnt to handle these potentially dangerous things. And talking of penknives, the Swiss Army teaches young adults how to use guns – with the result that guns are very rarely used in crime, despite the fact that all adults possess one.

We should be exposing our kids to more dangers. And younger. And in the setting of the family and in the context of the transition from kidhood to adulthood. Then they would be more able to handle the dangerous things that political correctness prevents them from experiencing and learning to control.

Comments (2)Add Comment
...
written by ThunderDragon, August 19, 2008
"Our repugnance of militarism leaves us with a deep suspicion of the boy scouts."

Huh? Since when did this happen? I've been a Scout and am now a Scout Leader and I have never, ever, come across any "deep suspicion" because of the non-existent "militarism" of the movement.
...
written by Alasdair, August 19, 2008
First, we should introduce our writers to a good dictionary and some understanding of the language ...

We don't need to introduce our youth to "more dangers" - we need to introduce kids to more risks, carefully, and with enough supervision that they (the kids) can survive the experiences ...

We need to introduce our kids to the very concepts that Political Correctness is designed to hide, so that our kids can learn from the expereinces of many other people, and hopefully not have to make the mistakes that those others made ...

And we can start by being less niggardly in our willingness to encourage our kids to have genuine exploratory experiences ...

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: