Blog Review 662 Print
Written by Netsmith   
Friday, 18 July 2008

Bad news for biofuel subsidies. Their costs are somewhere between 11 and 230 times the value of the savings they generate from emissions reduction. It would be vastly cheaper simply to do nothing at all than to continue such subsidies.

Global warming really is a matter of economics. A pity that so few are listening to the economists, isn't it?

For of course the environment is too important to be left to environmentalists.

Thhis announcement on being allowed to die at home: it might not be quite what it seems you know.

On dealing with threats of terrorism. Of course this is far too sensible to ever actually be implemented.

It would appear that one set of promises being made by one set of politicians might be in conflict with another set of promises made by that same set of politicians. Ho hum.

And finally, a way around the smoking ban.

Comments (1)Add Comment
...
written by Dr Alister McFarquhar, July 19, 2008
The few are wise to ignore climate economists. No point in view of dodgy science. Just a diversion from climate propaganda promulgated as Science.

No evidence of a measurable effect of mans CO2 on temperature rise which precedes CO2 increase. Just contested AGW hypothesis and models not yet explained by IPCC.

Warming about 0.5 D in 20 C and cooling since 1991 on most official series however dodgy the averaging not explained. No warming in S Hemisphere. No Problem justifies no action. see

http://www.aps.org/units/fps/newsletters/200807/monckton.cfm


Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

Powered by Azrul's Jom Comment for Joomla!
busy