Adam Smith Institute

Europe's favourite think tank website
  • Narrow screen resolution
  • Wide screen resolution
  • Decrease font size
  • Default font size
  • Increase font size
Policy for the Google generation Print E-mail
Written by Dr Eamonn Butler   
Thursday, 26 June 2008

Jeremy Hunt, the UK Conservatives' handsome, dynamic, young (42), wealthy Culture spokesman, was our guest at a power lunch in Westminster this week. His theme was policy for the Google generation. Technological advances – computers, mobile phones, the internet, interactive online stuff – have given people access and empowerment in ways they've never had before. But, think the Conservatives, politics and public policy has not moved on. Sure, you can file your tax form or buy a fishing permit online, but so what?

Contrast that with sluggishness with non-government action. Within minutes of the 9/11 attacks, websites were carrying eyewitness accounts that were as reliable as any that the BBC ran a day later. Within days of Hurricane Katrina, while the US government was still in paralysis, other websites had sprung up, linking the various relief agencies and helping people to track missing friends and relatives.

Technology, in other words, can enable us to decentralize public services and empower private or voluntary groups to deliver things better, quicker, and more locally. It enables millions of people to get involved in service delivery, where before it was run by an elite few. It allows the competition of millions of ideas where before things were decided in Whitehall. It means you don't have to have a top-down social and policy structure. It can be led by the people – what Hunt and his colleagues call 'collaborative individualism'.

They have a point. But how can this bottom-up revolution get started if big state institutions remain intact, crowding out everyone else? How will a thousand flowers bloom if state deadwood keeps out the sun? Time to get out the pruning shears.

Comments (3)Add Comment
...
written by cw, June 26, 2008
What Jeremy Hunt said above has been evident for some time. As your article's final paragraph says, it is difficult to see where and how power will be devolved down.

In office or on getting into office, I can't see any of our political parties (Conservatives included) relinquishing centralised power to their employers, the people. Our present government is clearly rushing in the other direction. It seems to me that politicians are politicians because they wish to wield power over their fellow citizens - even if, as a consequence, those fellow citizens are worse off. Perhaps the significant word in the article's final paragraph is 'revolution' – or we need a different breed, a Gorbachev (in his latter years - as I'd like to be around to see it happen).
Government failure in the internet connected world
written by Charles D Quarles, June 26, 2008
With all due respect, Dr. Butler, you are badly misinformed about the government's response to Hurricane Katrina. The Federal government of the US, including FEMA, put in place the most rapid and effective search, rescue, and relief effort in the history of the US to a hurricane related disaster; even though these efforts are historically done locally by private parties, charities, and local governments. To the extent that the government failed, it was Governor Kathleen Blanco's (State of Louisiana) and Ray Nagin's (City of New Orleans) failure to implement their own disaster plans and to hinder the Federal government's efforts. FEMA, Dr. Butler, is a logistics agency. It coordinates information so that private citizens, private charities, local governments, and State governments are able to implement disaster relief plans and efforts.

In the US, the Federal government cannot "take charge" until the Governor gives permission, including asking for the National Guard (which is State based) to be activated as armed forces under the orders of the President of the US. Governor Blanco, for whatever reason, delayed giving that important authorization. The US Federal government has no Constitutional authority to provide personal information to any third party without express permission. Local law enforcement, generally City and County agencies, do that; and these are always assisted by private parties and charitable organizations.
...
written by Richard Calhoun, July 02, 2008
The only way this revolution will start is by radically cutting public expenditure, particularly the welfare and benefits area and introducing a flat tax that will take all earners below £15000 p..a. out of the tax system.

Follow this up by reducing the size of the House of Commons ( surely long overdue ) and devolve powers to the people by localising and giving them the right to spend their own taxes on education and health for a start.

Write comment
This content has been locked. You can no longer post any comment.

busy
 

About the ASI

The Adam Smith Institute is the UK's leading innovator of free-market economic and social policies. Politically independent and non-profit, the Institute promotes its ideas through reports, briefings, events, media appearances, and its website and blog. For further information, click here.

Join our email list

Keep up-to-date with the latest events, reports and information from the Adam Smith Institute by joining our fortnightly email list. It's free and you can unsubscribe at any point. Just enter your email address here: 


Support the ASI

Enter Amount: