<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.3" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Social mobility and incentives</title>
		<description>Comments for Social mobility and incentives at http://adamsmith.org , comment 1 to 2 out of 2 comments</description>
		<link>http://adamsmith.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 01:33:15 +0100</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>FeedCreator 1.7.3</generator>
		<item>
			<title>You misunderstood...</title>
			<link>http://adamsmith.org/blog/politics/social-mobility-and-incentives-200806251605/#comment-496</link>
			<description>I was not in any way knocking state schools. Unfortunately, some people seem to think that going to a state-school means doom, and that a private education is necessary for success.  On a side note, I went to state schools too.  - Jason Jones</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:29:56 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>...</title>
			<link>http://adamsmith.org/blog/politics/social-mobility-and-incentives-200806251605/#comment-495</link>
			<description>Hey ASI! News-release from the department of the blinding obvious: most people don't need &quot;empirical data&quot; to believe that &quot;poor children who do well in their studies (EVEN IN STATE-SCHOOLS) will generally escape poverty&quot;.

Why the departure from your usual common-sense-based approach and tone? Last time I checked various British Prime Ministers, including Wilson and Heath off the top of my head, attended state schools, so I don’t see what they have done to deserve such a disparaging reference in this post.

Yours Disgruntledly,

Martin
Mayflower County High School alumini
 - Martin Jee</description>
			<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jun 2008 10:34:15 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
