Two views of Jeffrey Sach's new book: in itself if's not all that intellectually acute and commenting upon the same review, neither is the reviewer.
Might someone provide the Prime Minister with a history lesson or two?
Or perhaps logic lessons would be more appropriate? If violent porn and violent crime are substitutes (as seems likely ) rather than complements, then its banning will lead to more abused and dead people.
After a year at the Taxpayers' Alliance, what's going on there and what's it all about?