In recent years, many economists have proposed that a growth agenda with lower taxes is essential for the UK's long-term economic success. They argue that by reducing taxes, the UK can stimulate economic growth and create more jobs, which will ultimately benefit the entire country.

One of the most prominent economists who supports this view is Arthur Laffer, of Laffer Curve fame. It represents the relationship between tax rates and government revenue. Laffer argues that reducing tax rates can increase government revenue by stimulating economic growth and increasing tax compliance. This idea has been demonstrated in practice by countries such as Ireland, which reduced its corporate tax rate in the 1990s and saw a surge in economic growth and foreign investment. The UK saw this work with the Lawson tax cuts of the 1980s

Another US economist who backed a growth agenda with lower taxes was Milton Friedman, one of the most influential economists of the 20th century. Friedman argued that high taxes can lead to a "deadweight loss" in the economy by discouraging work, investment, and entrepreneurship. By lowering taxes, the government can encourage more economic activity and ultimately generate more revenue in the long run.

By reducing taxes, the government can stimulate economic growth, create more jobs, and increase government revenue in the long run. This, in turn, can lead to higher wages, better living standards, and increased prosperity. Of course, there will always be those who argue that lower taxes will lead to a reduction in public services, but this need not be the case if the government is able to reduce waste and improve efficiency.

One very important way to promote growth is to encourage innovation. UK companies need to invest in research and development. Increasing private sector investment in innovation can create a culture of innovation in the UK. Giving tax breaks to those who invest in innovation can set minds looking for ways to innovate. Encouraging collaboration between businesses and universities can also help in this regard.

The regulatory environment for innovators could be more supportive than it is. Regulation should be designed to encourage innovation, not hinder it. This includes ensuring intellectual property laws are clear and well-defined, as well as having regulations that promote competition and entrepreneurship, and make life easier for new market entrants with innovative products and processes.

A culture of encouraging entrepreneurship can lead to the development of innovative ideas and businesses. Providing training and resources to entrepreneurs can also help to promote innovation. There could be annual awards for innovative achievers to highlight their activities and to encourage emulation.

This mixture of low taxes, more investment in innovation and creating a climate of entrepreneurship is not some kind of witches brew dreamed up by theoreticians. It is a combination that has been shown to work in practice, and offers an attractive alternative to the decade of stagnation that might ensue if it is not applied in the UK.