Apparently, when private equity capitalism goes wrong it’s the consumers that benefit:

Critics of capitalism sometimes suggest that advertising is wasteful, diverting resources into promoting goods that might otherwise be used to lower the price.

This will not be the most intuitively obvious of contentions but you’ll get it once explained. Increasing the cigarette, or tobacco, tax reduces the price of cigarettes or tobacco.

The base idea enshrined in the theories of Professor Mazzucato is that the Man from Whitehall does know best. What should be produced, how it should be produced and by whom it should be produced.

In a piece about how the plan - by defining as flood plain and therefore making flood insurance impossible - has just killed off Ell Pie Island, we see this:

In a piece about how the plan - by defining as flood plain and therefore making flood insurance impossible - has just killed off Ell Pie Island, we see this:

The illusion that one can be scientific about complex phenomena (such as the workings of economic life) that depend on facts, values and information that we could never ascertain, is a dangerous one.

A useful little example of this free market thing here. The grand freedom is that we, us consumers, bend the capitalists to our will by our actions.

Economists believe that, with proper scientific understanding and analysis, they can make policy recommendations to governments that will improve the stability, efficiency, and operation of economic life.

Good to see that some are grasping this simple concept: Wes Streeting has ordered a “high-stakes” reorganisation of the NHS that will scrap 10,000 jobs in an attempt to free up cash for frontline care.

We can’t predict football matches, so why think we can predict the economy? The outcome of a match depends on so many factors: the teams’ structure and support, the players’ motivation, skill health, energy, confidence, ability to spot opportunities, and luck in taking them — and more.